Upon this a question arises: whether it be better to be loved than
feared or feared than loved? It may be answered that one should wish to
be both, but, because it is difficult to unite them in one person, is
much safer to be feared than loved, when, of the two, either must be
dispensed with.
Because this is to be asserted in
general of men, that they are ungrateful, fickle, false, cowardly,
covetous, and as long as you succeed they are yours entirely; they will
offer you their blood, property, life and children, as is said above,
when the need is far distant; but when it approaches they turn against
you.
And that prince who, relying entirely on their
promises, has neglected other precautions, is ruined; because
friendships that are obtained by payments, and not by greatness or
nobility of mind, may indeed be earned, but they are not secured, and in
time of need cannot be relied upon; and men have less scruple in
offending one who is beloved than one who is feared, for love is
preserved by the link of obligation which, owing to the baseness of men,
is broken at every opportunity for their advantage; but fear preserves
you by a dread of punishment which never fails.
Nevertheless
a prince ought to inspire fear in such a way that, if he does not win
love, he avoids hatred; because he can endure very well being feared
whilst he is not hated, which will always be as long as he abstains from
the property of his citizens and subjects and from their women. But
when it is necessary for him to proceed against the life of someone, he
must do it on proper justification and for manifest cause, but above all
things he must keep his hands off the property of others, because men
more quickly forget the death of their father than the loss of their
patrimony.
- The Prince by Macchiavelli